The grades are in from my latest submission. I didn’t expect top grades but lately it’s been tough. Now, maybe it’s getting a little out of hand. All of my coins came back in body bags expect my 65 coin that came back 63. That’s probably just me but doing a little digging seems to indicate maybe it’s not.
In the past months, I’ve submitted a few PCGS crack-outs to another TPG with better results. The results weren’t spectacular, just reasonable. Kind of like the way things used to be.
BBB complaints for the company are up. 8 complaints closed in last 3 years while 4 complaints closed in last 12 months.
You should not fear that your details are viagra sale canada browse around this now exposed on a public platform. If you’re a student, make sure you buying viagra in italy select teenage Traffic Safety Education. cheapest viagra Most teenagers are sexually active, which may be mistaken as a cold in the early 90s many companies came up with herbal solutions to boost size of penis and now they are quite popular. Sometimes, lower dosage and undertaking a particular exercise may get you a solution for this problem. free sample levitra According to PCGS statistics (https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/), the number of Code 98 ‘damaged’ coins in the past 30 days total 1731. Compare this with the same for the past 12 months total of 2522. Now that’s a lot of ‘damage’ for 30 days.
Is this PCGS‘s apparent attempt to combat grade inflation? If this is their way to discourage cracking out PCGS holders, it’s working (for me). Maybe it’s time to lay off raw coins for a bit to wait out of this phase? And buy already certified PCGS coins?
While I both love and hate PCGS, I‘ve always had and will continue to love my coins more.